Welcome to F.I.E.L.D.- the First Ismaili Electronic Library and Database. Guests are not required to login during this beta-testing phase

Copyright Lawsuit: Defenses Glorifying the Aga Khan filed in federal Court - 2010-04-29

Date: 
Thursday, 2010, April 29
Location: 
Source: 
Heritage News
20100429-court-filings.jpg

In a surprisingly rapid twist of events, both Mr Tajdin and Mr Jiwa have filed their respective statements of Defense this 29th of April 2010. They affirm to being devoted followers who will unconditionally abide by the wishes of the Aga Khan, whom they glorify in their defense.

Mr Tajdin declares that:

He has not been served yet but the ethics imposed upon him by his faith demands that he should not keep in ignorance the public by being silent on the issue and should clarify all of the facts, pertaining to this lawsuit, of which he is aware.

He reaffirms his allegiance to the Aga Khan, is willing to submit to any of his wishes, and is ready to surrender himself and all his possessions to the Imam.

He has been printing Farman books since 1992 with approval and instructions from the Imam received on August 15, 1992 in Montreal.

He has not received any communication from the Imam from 1992 to 2009 instructing him to stop publication.

He cannot stop publication without instruction from the Imam as this would be a breach of his oath of allegiance to the Imam.

All Farman publications were financial deficit projects done as a volunteer service and large numbers of books were distributed free of charge.

Farman sharing is a historic Ismaili tradition which still continues today.

The current Ismaili Constitution does not restrict the right to publish Farmans

Mr Tajdin concludes that:

He has no choice but to await further direct instructions from the Imam.

He reaffirms his allegiance to the Aga Khan, is willing to submit to any of His wishes, and is ready to surrender himself and all his possessions to the Imam.

Mr Jiwa states that:

"This action does not appear to have been authorized personally by the Aga Khan .."

"In distributing Farman books obtained from Tajdin to other Ismailis, he has not violated either the Ismaili Constitution or any Farmans"

He has not violated the copyright act as "Tajdin was given express authority by the Imam" and regardless of the fact that "the limitations period provided for by the Copyright Act also bars this action as the books containing the Farmans were commenced publication in the year 1992", he will still do whatever the Imam tells him to do.

Mr Jiwa clarifies finances:

He "obtains these books for C$50.00 from Tajdin and sells it for C$50.00, without any profit.

"All monies received by him from the sale of (other) books after 2005 were delivered to the Jamatkhanas"

Mr Jiwa further states that:

"If the Imam edited the Farman before releasing to the Jamats, in effect he is superceding the Farman he made orally previously."

He "unconditionally reconfirms his oath of allegiance to his Imam" and "if the Imam does not desire his Farman books to be distributed to the Jamats (...) this defendant will submit to the instructions of His Imam without reservation whatsoever"

Replies From the Plaintiff are due within 10 days, and Affidavits of Documents are due 30 days later.

[Update from May 6: Ogilvy Renault, the law firm which launched the case has asked for an extension of 15 days to reply to the Defense. They claim delays due to breakdown of email servers, blackberry communication, travel of senior lawyer, time difference with Paris etc...The more delays in this file, the more damage it creates to the reputation of the Ismaili community, the Imam and the defendants. It is to the advantage of all parties that this case be withdrawn from the courts.]

[Update from June 22: Defendants have filed a Motion for summary Judgement to have the case dismissed.]

[Update from September 5:
Online Book that gathers court materials as well as articles that are currently available for the ongoing 2010 Lawsuit:

Copyright Lawsuit 2010: Online Book of All available Materials
News on cross-examinations:
Copyright Lawsuit: CROSS_EXAMINATIONS Table of Contents - 2010-09-04
Latest Development
Copyright Lawsuit: Imam Appears for Discovery and Ends the Case - 2010-10-15
As users are asking to read the letters from Nagib and Alnaz on the court docket, the latest have been attached on the following link:
A. Various Court Filings

Revised Factums have been posted Here:
2010-11-29 Summary Judgment : Plaintiffs Revised Combined Factums of Reply and of Motion
2010-11-29 Summary Judgment: Defendants' Revised Factums of Motion and of Reply

There has been proven fraud in the recent past in the Aga Khan's domain by the Aga Khan's agents:
Aga Khan Lawsuit: Fraud at Aga Khan Studs - 2000-02-22

2011-05-25: A Jamati Member who has never met the Defendants volunteered as his brotherly duty to pay the $30,000 that was demanded in the Plaintiff''s submissions and that was accordingly ordered by the judge.
Read the full details of the $30,000 payment directly to H.H. The Aga Khan.

2011-06-16: The Appeal Memorandum of Fact and Law against the Summary Judgment has been filed in court by the defendants on June 16th, 2011.
Read the Full Appeal Memorandum of Fact and Law

Link to Court Docket Case T-514-10
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-60-11
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-59-11
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-156-13

Latest News Comments

AttachmentSize
Tajdin Defence Apr 29.10.pdf491.02 KB
Jiwa AK Defence Apr 29.10.pdf543.82 KB

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Did Imam receive misleading information by london (not verified)
Yes they are by Chai (not verified)
Are farmans relevant ! by London (not verified)
zak by zak (not verified)
Procès juridique by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
Comments reopened-librarian-umed by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
Are Leaders following instructions ! by bloglaw (not verified)
Re: comment of NN of June 2nd by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
Closing discussion/forum by London (not verified)
Comment reopened on June 2nd by librarian-umed
Comments temporarily closed by NN (not verified)
mowla knows everything by adnan muhammad (not verified)
EXCELLENT GESTURE and Procès juridique by ANONYMOUS (not verified)
Comments temporarily closed by rabya (not verified)
Procès juridique by Nato (not verified)
Did Dr Sacedina follow Guidance ! by Perplexed (not verified)
Another case in history by Salaam (not verified)
Constitution may be defended by Rabya (not verified)
another case in history by NN (not verified)
Re: Should leaders be sued too ! by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
Reply to "Another Case in History" by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
another case in history by the seeker of peace (not verified)
It is indeed very unfortunate by Salaam (not verified)
We are not Moral Police like Taliban by hasan (not verified)
Constitution MUST BE DEFENDED ! by bloglaw (not verified)
LEADERS ARE CORE OF MOWLA by Begum (not verified)
Should leaders be sued too ! by bloglaw (not verified)
I would really appreciate a by Husayn (not verified)
I think murids worldwide by rabya (not verified)
Reply to "I am not an expert in Canadian Judiciary..." by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
Leaders dont use the good & skilled by Leader (not verified)
Why not endorse the Book ! by bloglaw (not verified)
I am not an expert in Canadian Judiciary... by Unnlahaq (not verified)
It is indeed very unfortunate by NN (not verified)
correct, Doctrine of Imamat by AmarS (not verified)
Who will win by Bloglaw (not verified)
Correct. Doctrine of Imamat by moosaji (not verified)
Lawsuit by hasan (not verified)
statement by zak (not verified)
lawyers not saying Imam spoke to them! by bloglaw (not verified)
The statement by noor (not verified)
It is indeed very unfortunate... by Ali Abjani (not verified)
We are to blame by bloglaw (not verified)
I don't follow the logic in by someone (not verified)
DU DU by Amin Hussain (not verified)
Yes by heritage
Signature by Ali (not verified)
to settle or not to settle by bloglaw (not verified)
I agree with you. by Naseer (not verified)
I saw the statement and I by Kericho (not verified)
After reading the sworn by someone (not verified)
Kalam-e Imam-e-Zaman by Amin Hussain (not verified)
Book by Concerned about truth (not verified)
Firman is Noor by Noor (not verified)
Lawyer by Bloglaw (not verified)
Reply to Awji's comment by kanize (in Canada) (not verified)
Kalam -e Imam-e-Zaman by H (not verified)
Kalam-e Imam-e-Zaman by Awji (not verified)
AS this is such an by confused Murid (not verified)
Well said!!! Farmans guide by Rabya (not verified)
mr sachedina by karim m dossani (not verified)
Whar are farmans and talika's to Ismailies ! by Murid confused (not verified)
firman is Noor by dolly (not verified)
Firman is Noor by Rooh Dost (not verified)
response to dolly by indigo (not verified)
Book by United States (not verified)
reply to Kanize by doctor dolly (not verified)
Farmans by jimmy the kid (not verified)
Tarika by MK (not verified)
TariquahBoard by England (not verified)
Reply to Doctor Dolly by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
The sole pupose of firmans. by Doctor Dolly (not verified)
Trust begets Trust by Bloglaw (not verified)
Lawsuit by Zina Khan (not verified)
Khane by jimmy the kid (not verified)
Book by jimmy the kid (not verified)
Repy to Murid by Nazish (not verified)
Well said, Murid!!!! by Gulshanbai (not verified)
It is called legitimate by Kericho (not verified)
Embarrassment by murid (not verified)
The Imam would definately by London (not verified)
Whodunit by AmarS (not verified)
Lawsuit by AmarS (not verified)
FROM UK by VAKIL (not verified)
lawsuit by hanif (not verified)
Gulshanbai by Nazish (not verified)
To Kanize and London by Peace (not verified)
Dear Nazish by Gulshanbai (not verified)
who initiated the action by NN (not verified)
Who really initiated the lawsuit? by doctor dolly (not verified)
Why not settle ! by Bloglaw (not verified)
You will surely backfire by Nazish (not verified)
Perfection by bloglaw (not verified)
If Sachedina is in by Good Leadership (not verified)
To kanize and London: my by fromuk (not verified)
who initiated the action by rabya (not verified)
who initiated the action? by doctor dolly (not verified)
This is a story like David by Kericho (not verified)
You will surely backfire by Gulshanbai (not verified)
Reply to Believer ("Who initiated the action??) by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
Who initiated the action by Peace (not verified)
Who initiated the action?? by Believer (not verified)
motion by taras (not verified)
Motion by Good governamce (not verified)
When I read about this book by fromuk (not verified)
I don't think Ogilvy has the by librarian-umed
Obey the Imam by Sadrudin (not verified)
Obey the Imam by Believer (not verified)
Leadership by Good Governance (not verified)
You argument based on by Adnan (not verified)
Unfair treatment of the Defendants by AmarS (not verified)
Unfair treatment of the Defendants by Observer (not verified)
Blaming Ismailis by AmarS (not verified)
The Leadership has lost their ethical right by Shujaa Gharib (not verified)
ogilvy renault by karim m dossani. (not verified)
If the leaders wanted to by murid (not verified)
Reply to Tanzania's comment by Kanize (not verified)
S is absolutely right! by xaf (not verified)
Reply to a Pakistani Ismaili by Saqib Canada (not verified)
the case by doctor dolly (not verified)
This is actually kind of funny by S (not verified)
Depositions OR Mulakat by Sadrudin (not verified)
Peer Sadrdin by RRK (not verified)
It is rather hard to believe by Tanzania (not verified)
information just received: by librarian-umed
LIF annnouncement by Sadrudin (not verified)
real murids by Mongolian (not verified)
My Thoughts, My Opinions (Without Prejudice) by Nizar Ali K. Shivji (not verified)
Signature by Rahim (not verified)
Most merciful Mowla. by Adam (not verified)
Signature by Samir Noorali (not verified)
It is rather hard to believe by Doctor Dolly (not verified)
Blaming Ismailis by NN (not verified)
Reply to Kanize by AmarS (not verified)
Blaming Ismailies by Sadrudin Alibhai (not verified)
reponse to ruksana by shamsuddin mehri (not verified)
Blaming Ismailis by Shelina (not verified)
leaders of the jamats(LIF) by karim m dossani (not verified)
law suit by murid (not verified)
Reply to AmarS by kanize (not verified)
Reply to Amin's comment by Kanize (not verified)
It is a respected lawfirm, by librarian-umed
I doubt the Law Firm is wrong... by I doubt that LIF is behind this (not verified)
Response to Ruksana by Indigo (not verified)
It is high time that the by NN (not verified)
Where is the proof by Observer (not verified)
Hey Ruksana, I am lost here, by rabya (not verified)
response to rukhsana by indigo (not verified)
Where is the proof by Ruksana (not verified)
100% right, what a fiasco by Rabya (not verified)
Who is to be blamed for this mess by AmarS (not verified)
Internet Discussion by Observer (not verified)
YOU AREVERY RIGHT, AGREE by ABDULMALIK (not verified)
I AGREE WITH YOU 100 by abdulmalik (not verified)
My thoughts by Indigo (not verified)
you can see by yourself on by librarian-umed
not served? by AZ (not verified)
forged signature of hazar imam by karim m dossani (not verified)
Letters by Samir Noorali (not verified)
Comment by Sarghalta (not verified)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Back to top